Introduction
I.
THE BACKGROUND FOR THE STUDY
Poverty in Vietnam is largely a rural phenomenon as about 90
percent of the poor live in rural areas. The incidence of poverty is higher in
rural areas (45 percent of the rural population is living below the poverty
line) than in urban areas (10-15 percent) and so is the depth of poverty.
Clearly, what happens to rural areas still dominates the effect on the lives of
the poor.
Therefore, the development strategy should be focused on
rural development and greater reliance needs to be placed on the development of
the non-farm sector particularly in rural areas in order to create more
employment opportunities, narrow down rural - urban income gap and reduce rural
poverty.
Inadequate economic infrastructure has been identified as
one of the main elements in the persistence of rural poverty because it hinders
opportunities to seek additional off-farm income and greater participation in
the market economy. According to the World Bank, rural Vietnamese have less
access to infrastructure, and less than one-third of Vietnam’s population has
access to all three key types of facilities: passable roads, public transport,
and permanent markets.
So, stimulating rural growth remains a major challenge for
Vietnam. It will require a host of reforms, including establishing a level
playing field with the state sector, removing constraints to accessing capital,
establishing a reliable legal framework, and provision of supporting
infrastructure.
II.
THE RELEVANCE AND PURPOSES OF THE THESIS
Vietnam is poor both in terms of household living standards
and physical infrastructure, specifically transportation. Therefore, the
importance of infrastructural investment in promoting pro-poor economic growth
will draw much attention from government and donors.
In the thesis I hope to test the hypothesis: there is a
strong relationship between living standards of rural people and services
provided by rural transport infrastructure.
The results of this thesis are quite significant within a
policy framework. If the test shows a strong relationship, the study will be a
useful reminder for policy-makers in their economic decision-making with
regards to rural infrastructural investments, in process of assailing rural
development in Vietnam.
The thesis aims:
1.
To identify and understand the role of transport
infrastructure in rural development.
2.
To assess the state of Vietnam’s rural infrastructure,
especially the road system, and its impacts on living standards in rural areas.
3.
To provide policy makers with suggestions about how to improve
quality and quantity of road system in order to support rural development as
well as the economic growth of the country.
III.
THE RESEARCH QUESTIONS
The thesis focuses on the following central research
question:
“What role could
improved infrastructure, specifically a better road system, play in reducing
rural poverty in Vietnam?”
The answer to the question raised above will be based on the
following sub-questions:
1.
What is the role of infrastructure, specifically
transportation infrastructure, in economic development?
2.
What is the state of Vietnam’s rural infrastructure,
specifically Vietnam’s rural road system?
3.
How and to what extent do a road system and other
infrastructure affect rural living standards?
IV.
THE DATA SOURCES
The thesis studies
the link between rural living standards and rural transport infrastructure.
Data is largely extracted from the Vietnam Living Standards Survey in 1997-1998
(VLSS98), which was conducted nationwide by the General Statistical Office
(GSO).
Besides original or
primary data from VLSS98, secondary and tertiary data from a variety of sources
is also used in the thesis.
V.
THE RESEARCH METHODS
In the thesis, a
variety of methods are used to analyze and assess Vietnam’s rural
infrastructure and its impact on rural living standards. These methods include
literature reviews, descriptive analysis, cross-section data analysis,
statistical analysis, and regression analysis.
VI. THE
THESIS SCOPE
In Vietnam, rural development is much debated issue to all
policy makers since it is vital to determine the success of economic
development of the whole country. This thesis limits itself to a study of only
rural areas. The fact that the rural population is a more homogeneous group is
also a reason to make the thesis to concentrate on rural areas for greater
convenience in analysis.
Because of lack of information, the thesis can not cover all
kinds of transport infrastructure such as roads, railways, and waterways, etc.
in detail. Instead, it focuses on the road system, which is extensively used by
the rural inhabitants in Vietnam. Where relevant and possible, other kinds of
rural infrastructure are considered in an attempt to give a general picture of
Vietnam’s overall rural infrastructure.
In general, this thesis takes income as a proxy for living
standard. However, where possible, other components of living standards (i.e.
health and education), will be examined in detail.
VII.
THE STRUCTURE OF THE THESIS
This thesis is organised into four chapters:
§
Chapter
One will review the literatures on fundamental concepts
and definitions relating to transport infrastructure and analyse its role and
economic effects in rural areas.
§
Chapter
Two will describe Vietnam’s rural infrastructure and
explain how rural living standards relate to rural infrastructure, specifically
the road network.
§
Chapter
Three will quantitatively analyse the relationship between
rural road infrastructure and rural living standards, which are represented by
household incomes. This chapter will use the consistent data from VLSS98.
§
Chapter
Four summaries the main findings of previous chapters
which leads to the thesis’s conclusions and provides some suggestive policy
implications for rural development and poverty elimination strategies in
Vietnam.
Chapter One
Literature
Review and Theoretical Framework
I.
TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: THEORIES
This section aims to form a research framework by reviewing
literature focusing on the various impacts of improvement of transport
infrastructure, specifically road network, on economic development.
1. The
Freedman’s Model
This is a four-stage model in which a single urban core
expanded across the rural periphery, progressively reducing urban-rural
disparities and producing a homogeneous development space. The role of infrastructure
and efficient transport in insuring the movement of people and goods is
central, and is indicated in the model by the arrows showing the direction as
well as the nature of movement. In this model, economic development is not only
the result of a proper combination of private production factors such as labor
and capital, but also of infrastructure in general and transport systems in
particular.
The Von Thunen model and a model for interregional trade
will illustrate the differential effects of improvements of transport
infrastructure as follows:
2. The
Von Thunen Model
In the Von Thunen model, which describes the trade
relationship between an agricultural region and urban region (trading center),
improvement of transport infrastructure leads to a decrease in transportation
costs of agricultural products. According to Von Thunen, the economic benefits
in the form of a rent increase will accrue to landowners. Therefore, there will
be a tendency to extend the agriculture area. This leads to an increase in the
supply of agricultural products. Only when this increase of supply leads to a
decrease of prices of agricultural products will urban consumers benefit from
the improved transport infrastructure. Thus, in the Von Thunen model, the
landowners are the main beneficiary of improved transport infrastructure.
3. The
Model of Interregional Trade
Figure 1 illustrates the standard model of interregional
trade. In the model, when transportation cost is less than the difference in
equilibrium price for a certain good in two regions, export takes place from
region 1 to region 2. In comparison, in a situation without trade, there is an
additional surplus consisting of area A (accruing to producers in region 1) and
B (accruing to consumers in region 2). Thus, both regions benefit from trade
according to the model.
|

Source: Rietveld, P. (1989), Infrastructure and regional development, A survey of multiregional
economic models, Springer-Verlag, Holland, p. 257.
|
Improvement of transport infrastructure leads to a decrease
in transportation costs and hence to an increase in transportation volumes. The
equilibrium price in region 1 will increase, and the price in region 2 will
decrease. As a result, in region 1, producers benefit from the improvement of
transport infrastructure, whereas consumers are negatively affected. In region
2 it is the other way around. With respect to employment, region 1 benefits,
but region 2 is hurt by the improvement in transport infrastructure.
4. A
General Equilibrium Model
Figure 2 shows the main effects when many sectors are
considered simultaneously. In this case the net effects are difficult to
predict. Also, it is even more difficult to predict processes (reallocation of
capital and persons) caused by changes in transport infrastructure in the long
term.
5. Difficulties
in Studying
|
Figure 2:
Effects of Improvement of Transport Infrastructure

Source: Rietveld, P. (1989), Infrastructure and regional development,
A survey of multiregional economic models, Springer-Verlag, Holland, p.
258.
|
The difficulties in predicting the processes can be seen
clearly from the points of view of the two following approaches. One is the
production function approach and the other is the interregional approach.
In the production
function approach, the higher productivity of private production factors
owing to the improvement of transport infrastructure implies that less inputs
are needed for the same level of output (assuming that other inputs are
substitutes of transport infrastructure). However, the decrease in production
costs will lead to a decrease in prices and hence an increase in output. This
would in turn lead to a higher demand for the inputs. The net balance of the
two effects is, therefore, uncertain.
A similar result is found for the interregional trade approach in terms of employment.
Apart from reasons mentioned in the two approaches above,
further difficulties are also identified.
Time frame
Transport infrastructure improvements have a wide variety of
effects on firms and consumers. However, these effects are also often difficult
to trace because of the lengthy time it may take before an economy adjusts to
the new situation.
Directionality
In studying the relationship between transport
infrastructure and economic development, the problem of directionality is usually involved.
Section remarks:
§
Improvement of transport systems leads to a higher
productivity of private production factors. It affects trade relationships and
hence the location of production factors. Transport investment contributes to
economic diversification enabling exploitation of economies of scope and
increases the economy’s ability to handle risks.
§
Improvement of transport infrastructure also influences
household consumption, giving rise to substantial redistribution effects among
economic groups and also among regions.
§
Due to the problems of time frame and directionality,
the impacts of improvement of transport infrastructure are very difficult to
predict.
§
The existence or construction of a new transport
infrastructure does not mean that development will automatically or necessarily
follow. It depends on the particular features of the existing network and of
the regions concerned.
II.
TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTRE AND RURAL LIVING
STANDARDS
1. Rural
Transport Infrastructure in Developing Countries
Rural transport encompasses all the transport activities
which take place at local government, community and household levels. It is
composed of two elements, the rural transport services for passengers and
freight by non-motorized and motorized means of transport, and rural transport
infrastructure, mainly rural roads, paths and footbridges, and in some cases
rural waterways.
The length of the classified rural road network is usually
two to three times the length of the main and provincial network. However, on
average they carry only about 10 percent of the total traffic in
vehicle-kilometers. Often, these roads are in bad condition, only seasonally
passable and poorly maintained. Many communities are still without motorable
access at all. Sometimes, rural roads are often over-designed, resulting in
waste of scarce resources. Over-design can be a result of political pressure attempting
to apply standard designs by road type instead of actual traffic.
A typical phenomenon in developing countries is that rural
dwellers mostly use non-motorized transport such as bicycles and animal carts.
Most of them make trips on foot and suffer from inadequate access to markets
and to basic social services.
2. Transport
Infrastructure and Rural Development
Access to infrastructure services is one of the essential
components of personal welfare. It implies that transport has a direct impact
on personal welfare. Improvements in transport not only provide people with
more convenient access to a wide range of socio-economic opportunities, but
also have strong income effects by lowering transport cost and hence the prices
of consumer goods and services. In these ways, transport contributes to the
improvement of personal welfare in rural areas.
For people living in rural areas, the lack of affordability
of their transportation costs prevents them to take advantage of job
opportunities and even very basic social services. Reliable access to schools
and health services for them contributes directly to their accumulation of
human capital, which is a key factor in economic growth of rural areas.
3. Transport
Infrastructure and Rural Poverty
Although local roads in rural areas where most of the poor
live make only a modest contribution to national income growth they are likely
to have a direct and significant impact on the daily life of the poor.
4. The Negative Effects
Despite some benefits rural transport
infrastructure brings to the rural dwellers, there are several shortcomings
inherently related to the provision of rural transport infrastructure in the
effort to reduce poverty. These problems are inherent in the transport sector
and may lead to adverse distributive impacts.
1. First,
emphasis of the efficiency criterion in transport project selection and design
is likely to involve a “bias” against the poor.
2. Second,
transport market and institutional failures tend to impose relatively greater
harm on the poor.
3.
Third, government regulations in the transport sector are
often regressive, especially where they place limitations on the entry,
provision, and use of transport services relevant to the poor.
Chapter Two
Vietnam Rural
Transport Infrastructure
This chapter concentrates on describing Vietnam’s rural
infrastructure, especially transportation infrastructure. Several kinds of
rural infrastructure and their relationship with rural living standards will be
examined.
I.
VIETNAM RURAL TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE
With a narrow and long shape, nearly 2,000 km from North to
South, and with a littoral nearly 3,200 km in the East and South-West, Vietnam
has a large transport system covering all modes, namely: road, waterway,
railway, seaway and airway. However, in rural areas, inhabitants mainly travel
and transport goods by roads or, in some regions, by waterways.
1.
Vietnam Transportation Development Progress
Before 1954, when Vietnam was under the domination of
French, the system of roads was developed in a rather short time. French
colonists only concentrated on developing arteries connecting some area centers
in order to support their resource exploitation and colony control policies.
Little attention was paid to development of an adequate road system in favor of
indigenous people.
During 1955-75 Vietnam was temporarily divided into two
parts having different economic systems. The Saigon administration had the
intention of modeling the economy towards a capitalist model. With regard to
transportation, too few roads were built, and only main and strategic roads
were improved and upgraded with the aim of serving army purposes.
During 1976-85, economic priority was redirected to
overcoming the aftermath left by the war and reforming the South’s economy to
harmonize with the North’s economic model.
From 1986 up to now was the period of economic transition
from an old centrally planed management mechanism to a new market oriented one
and the new economic mechanism was starting to show its effects. Upon
integration into the new economic development, the communication and
transportation sectors also recorded tremendous achievements.
2.
Vietnam Existing Road Transportation
|
Figure 3:
Vietnamese Roads: Quantity not Quality

Note: All other country figures are road lengths of
standard regional quality.
Source: UNDP (1996), Catching
up, Hanoi, p. 56.
|
In recent years, along with the transition of the whole
economy, road transportation system has been enormously expanded. As far as the
mere quantity of roads is concerned, Vietnam compares rather well with other
countries in the region. The qualitative picture is much less bright. Figure 3 depicts comparative road networks in the region for
road standard quality. The existing infrastructure of Vietnam’s roads and bridges
is very old and low in standard. The road network is unevenly distributed among
the different provinces of the country.
3.
Vietnam Inland Waterway Network
Vietnam’s inland waterway network is one of the best in the
world.
Waterways in the North of the country are formed by the
system of the Red and Thai Binh rivers that are quite shallow in the dry
season.
Waterways in the South are formed by the system of the
Mekong and Dong Nai rivers. The two-river system is connected by a network of
canals that create favorable conditions for waterway traffic. As a result, much
of the transport in the southern part is done by waterway.
Rivers in the central region have specific characteristics:
slope, narrow, and fast flowing in the raining season and shallow water in the
dry season. In the Central region inland waterway routes are short, and mainly
used for cargo transport within province, from mountainous areas to seashore
ones.