INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
I. OBJECTIVE AND SIGNIFICANCE
OF THE STUDY
From 1991, following the 1987
Law on Foreign Investment, the Regulation on EPZ in Vietnam was issued, which
was the basis for establishing of Vietnam’s EPZs. With 96 IZs planed to
establish to 2010, until 2000, 67 IZs have been established over the country.
Initially, there were six EPZs but now only three of them remain EPZs and three
others were reclassified as IZs. Recently, some IZs, open economic zones and
special economic zones have opened or planned to open, but no more EPZs will be
built in the immediate future and the contribution of EPZs to economic
development is debatable.
The thesis attempts to
analyze the roles of the EPZs in Vietnam’s development process and provides
answers to the following questions:
·
What are
attractivenesses of Vietnam’s EPZs to foreign investors?
·
What is the
contribution of EPZs to the industrialization of Vietnam?
·
What are the
causes for the success or failure of Vietnam’s EPZs?
·
What are
policy implications for improving the performance of Vietnam’s EPZs?
2. METHODOLOGY
The research applies a
descriptive and analytical framework to evaluate the contribution of Vietnam’s
EPZs to economic development. The scope of the study is limited to some Asian
countries that have most successful EPZs development, which can be drawn lessons
for Vietnam. Vietnam’s EPZs will be analysed in the period from 1991 to 2000.
3. ORGANIZATION OF THE
PAPER
Excluding introduction, the
thesis is organized into four chapters:
Chapter One - Theoretical
framework
Chapter Two - Asian country
case studies
Chapter Three - Export
Processing Zones in Vietnam
Chapter Four - Policy
implications and conclusion.
Chapter One:
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
1.1.
OVERVIEW OF EXPORT PROCESSING ZONES
1. Definitions
There are about 30 terms used
to describe the EPZs. Basically they are the same and can be defined in either
large or narrow meaning. In Vietnam, the EPZ concept is defined in the
Regulation on EPZ issued by the Vietnam’s Government as “an industrial zone (IZ)
where export processing enterprises specializing in the production of goods for
export and in the provision of services for the production of export goods and
export activities are concentrated, having delimited geographic boundaries and
no inhabitant, established by decision of the Government or the Prime Minister”.
2. Historical background of
EPZs
According to Dorkenoo (1999),
the FTZ concept has been used in history about 2000 years ago, which involves
transportation-shipment, storage and re-exporting of goods.
The modern form of EPZ came
from the establishment of the first EPZ in Ireland in 1959. In 1965, the first
Asian zone was the Kandla EPZ established by the Indian Government, followed by
the establishment of a range of EPZs in many countries. Around the end of
twentieth century, EPZs become an attractive strategy to many LDCs as they seem
to facilitate the growth of industry and trade.
3. Objectives and
characteristics of EPZs
EPZs are the trade policy
tools at the disposal of LDC Governments. Typically, they are created as open
market oases within a second best economy that is dominated by distorted trade,
macro and exchange rate regulation, and other regulatory Government controls.
EPZs are commonly established for some primary objectives:
-
To provide foreign exchange earning by promoting non-traditional exports
-
To provide jobs to alleviate unemployment or under-employment problems in
the country and assist in income creating
-
To attract FDI and engender technological transfer, knowledge spill-over.
-
To get economies of scale returns from focusing limited infrastructure
investments.
Though different in name and
size, zones share a few common features:
-
Unlimited, duty-free imports of raw, intermediate input and capital goods
necessary for the production of exports.
-
Less Government red tape. More flexibility with labour laws for the firms
in the zone than in the domestic market.
-
Generous and long-term tax holidays and concessions to the firms
-
Better standard communication services and infrastructure in comparison
with the rest of the country. The utility and land rent are often subsidized by
the Government
-
Zone firms can be domestic, international or joint-venture, but the role
of FDI is prominent in EPZ activities
-
Further, EPZs are said to under go a four-stage life cycle: formation,
take-off, maturity and decline (Oh, 1992).
1.2.
COSTS AND BENEFITS OF EXPORT PROCESSING ZONES
1. Neo-classical model
The neo-classical pessimism
is pioneered by Hamada (1974) and followed by many others, come to the same
conclusion that the EPZs reduce host country welfare. Later, Devereuz and Chen
(1995) expand on Hamada’s analysis by adding volume of trade and factor terms of
trade effects. They conclude that the EPZ are likely to be welfare improving
under a much wider variety of circumstances than previously realized.
The neo-classical analysis is
criticized because it does not take into account some positive externalities of
FDI; the Hecksher-Ohlin based analysis is based on final goods while most of the
EPZ issues are related to intermediate inputs, and while treating the capital as
being internationally mobile, it fails to capture the international mobility of
capital goods- that is central to the functioning of EPZs. Therefore, the
conclusion of most neo-classical theories that EPZs reduce the welfare of the
countries is thus largely irrelevant.
2. Cost- benefit analysis
In the point of view of the
host country, the net benefit of EPZ in a given year t can be written: Nt
= (Ltw + MtPM + EtPE + Rt
+ Tt) S*F – (Ltw* + MtP*M
+ EtP*E + BtS*K)
- At - Kt
where: Lt
denotes employment in year t, w denotes wage paid, Mt denotes
domestic raw material used in year t, PM denotes the price paid for
this raw material, Et denotes the utilities used in year t,
PE denotes the price paid for these utilities, Rt
denotes interest and principal repayments of domestic loans in year t, Tt
denotes taxes paid in year t, S*F denotes the ratio of the
social over official value of exchange rate, w* denotes the shadow
price of labour, P*M denotes the shadow price of domestic
raw material, P*E denotes the shadow price of utilities, Bt
denotes domestic borrowing in year t, S*K denotes the
ratio of the shadow price of capital to its market price, At denotes
the administrative costs of the zone in year t, Kt denotes the
capital cost of the physical infrastructure of the EPZ provided by the host
Government in year t.
This model has been developed
by Warr since 1983. Later, he used this method to evaluate some Asian EPZs, come
to result that EPZs bring substantial benefits in some cases while create not
any net benefit in some other cases. Spinnager (1984) also used the model for
some other empirical studies and argued that the incentives, subsidies and
spending on infrastructure are very costly for the host country. They concluded
that the overall welfare impact of EPZs on the host economy is beneficial but
limited.
The main drawback to this
approach is the lack of adequate data for the cost-benefit calculations.
Assumptions regarding rates of returns to capital, social discount rate and
social benefits may also be easily questioned. More generally, while costs may
be more readily observable, the extent of the benefits may not be, as there are
many possible qualitative benefit that are difficult to be taken into account.
3. New growth model
The new growth approach to
the possible welfare implications of EPZ come from emerging endogenous growth
literature, which highlights the impact of spillovers from FDI and zone
activities on the host economy. These spillovers include labor and management
on-the-job training and learning-by-doing, copying, demonstration effects and
catalyst factor, and impact the rate and level of human capital formation in
host countries. Once these elements are added to the traditional analytical
approach, Johanson (1994) argued, the EPZ may be beneficial to a country because
of their spillover and their catalytic impact.
4. Costs and benefits of EPZs
– statistical analysis
Based on theories have been
used to evaluate impact of EPZs performance to host economy and the “enclave
model”, the author try to analyse all possible costs and benefits of EPZs in the
point of view of the host country Government in order to have a clear framework
to evaluate Vietnam’s EPZs.
Figure 1.1: The enclave
model
|

|
Intermediate goods |
|
Labour |
|
|

|
Processed goods |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
   Rest
|
Capital goods |
|
Capital goods |
|
|
 Of
|
Remitted profits |
EPZ |
Processed goods |
Domestic |
|
 The
|
Management skill |
|
Taxes |
Economy |
|
 World
|
Technical knowledge |
|
Subsidies |
|
|
(ROW)
|
|
|
Utilities |
|
|
|
|
|
External effects |
|
Investment and growth
Usually, EPZs are established
to provide favourable conditions including good location, stable macroeconomic
conditions, basic infrastructure and goods management mechanism to attract
investment and stimulate growth, especially industries use the comparative
advantages of the host countries to produce export goods that are able to
compete in the international market by attracting ‘footloose’ foreign
manufacturers.
To the extent that foreign
firms locate in the EPZ, the most visible achievement is the inflow of foreign
capital to the EPZ in comparison with foreign capital into the domestic economy
as a whole. As the decision factor of the success of the EPZ is the number of
the firms that operate within it, it also can be used as a criterion to evaluate
an EPZ.
Export and foreign exchange
earning
Developing the export of
manufacturing products and earning foreign exchange are main benefits expected
from an EPZ. The contribution of EPZ may be evaluated by the export revenue of
every production firms in the zone, or in comparison with total export revenue
of the country. There is also indirect effect of EPZ into host country export,
shown by the increasing number of trade partner, as the role of EPZ firms in
giving the access to international market to the host country processing goods.
While the contribution of EPZ
in host country export is rather clearly, its role in foreign exchange earning
is still debatable. The fully foreign owned EPZ firms can treat their foreign
exchange earning in three ways: (1) held in liquid form in foreign exchange
accounts, whether inside or outside the host country; (2) used for the purchase
of imported capital equipment; and (3) converted into the domestic currency to
be spent on wages and purchases from the local economy. The gain of domestic
economy in term of foreign exchange is not important and can be omitted in the
analysis on the impact of EPZ on domestic economy.
Tax revenue/tax loss effects
To create incentives for
attracting FDI, the Government often offers tax breaks and tax holidays in both
direct and indirect taxes for foreign firms investing in EPZs. Accompanied with
significant investment into infrastructure, the tax holidays increase the costs
of EPZs. However, though generally quite small, taxes raised from EPZ firms
nevertheless represent a clear source of economic benefit for the domestic
economy.
In case of Vietnam’s EPZs,
because most of EPZ firms now are still in the tax exemption period, the
government does not collect any tax from the zones. However, in the near future,
when the EPZs are in their take off and mature period, the tax revenue is
expected to be significant.
Firms’ profits or losses
Most firms occupying EPZs are
fully foreign owned and their profits or losses, to the extent that being
retained or incurred themselves, do not have any effect on the domestic economy,
except for the profit tax collection as mentioned above. Therefore, the profits
of domestically owned firms will be omitted.
Employment effect
EPZs exploit the
international mobility of capital goods owned by internationally ‘footloose’
manufacturing firms. EPZs are essentially devices for attracting these firms and
their capital equipment into the host country where these capital goods are
combined with domestic labour- relatively immobile internationally- to produce
trade goods that the firm exports. In this process, for the poor and labour
abundant country, the welfare impact is increasing jobs generated, the
unemployment and under-employment problems are solved. However, the gain from
employment generated by the EPZ may be the exceeding of the wage received by the
workers to the opportunity cost of employment in EPZ. There is also a
qualitative gain from employment aspect. It is the transfer of skills to EPZ
employees through on-the-job training or learning by doing process. It can be
treated as positive externality of EPZ that in principle should reduce
opportunity cost of EPZ employment.
Environment effects
To create positive
relationship between industrialization and development, one urgent measurement
is to prevent industrial pollution in the initial stage of industrialization. In
EPZs, treatment or disposal measures are more cost-effective because of
economies of scale involved. From available data, it is very difficult to
analyse the environment effect from an EPZ. Instead, there is may be relevant
for a description about the pollutant control measures of both the domestic
Government and the foreign firms in an attempt to protect the environment.
Linkages between EPZ and the
domestic economy
Under the ‘enclave model’,
there are both forward and backward linkages between the EPZ firms and the
domestic economy. Both forward and backward linkages bring no net welfare
effects but there is existence of positive externalities in these forward and
backward linkages. The EPZ can be a connection between the domestic enterprises
with the international market, when the domestic enterprises may lack the access
to international market. Further, when developing these linkages, the technology
as well as knowledge may spill-over and bring some gain to the host country.
Therefore, when evaluating the gain from EPZ in term of linkages, the criteria
may be the trade volume or revenue between EPZ firms and the host country, or
can compare these criteria with total export, import of the EPZ as a whole.
FDI: technology transfer and
knowledge spillover
The obtained technologies, if
mastered, yield a higher level of TFP for any given capital-labour ratio, and
combined with accumulated physical investment will move the economy from point A
in production function f0 to point B in a new and higher production
function f1 as indicated in the figure 1.2 below

Technology transfer into
Vietnam through EPZs mainly came from FDI and knowledge spillover. The FDI
inflow into EPZ is considered together with some positive externalities.
However, it is difficult to evaluate quantitatively those positive
externalities. The suitable way is to use some indicators that are related to
the improvement or transfer of technology such as the FDI inflow, the expansion
of international market, and the linkages between EPZs firms and the domestic
enterprises.
Land rent
In EPZ development, there are
two categories of land rent which are rental of land from the government to
infrastructure firms that develop the EPZ, and the rental of land with completed
infrastructure from these firms to the production firms. In the enclave model of
EPZs, the land rent that the Government collects from the EPZ is a source of
Government revenue which present the net benefit to the economy. However, with
the objective to attract FDI, the Government often set low land rent which is
frequently reduced to infrastructure firms (VIZA, 2000). Therefore in the
analysis, the rent land is not treated as benefit to the domestic economy.
Instead, a comparison between land rents between countries, or between EPZ and
elsewhere in the host country is used to analyse the comparative advantage of
the country or the EPZ in attracting FDI.
Costs of EPZs
To establish the EPZ, there
are costs of clearing the site, compensation for existing works, investing and
maintaining the infrastructure system, including transport, communication, water
and electricity lines, and other administrative costs to operate and control the
EPZs.
In some cases, the EPZs are
invested and developed by the Government, every costs above should be treated as
economic costs of the EPZs. In other cases, EPZs are invested and developed by a
company, who rent the land from the Government to develop the EPZ and then lease
it to production firms. For these cases, the costs to the Government include the
investment into the connection between the EPZ and the existing infrastructure
system, or social infrastructure outside the EPZ such as residential dwelling,
schools and health centers. However, it is difficult to evaluate these costs as
at the same time they may be used for some other purposes and have significant
positive externalities such as improve living condition as well as economic
development of surrounding areas of the EPZs, or urbanization of the previously
rural poor area, etc.
Chapter Two: ASIAN
COUNTRY CASE STUDIES
2.1. EPZs
IN TAIWAN
Taiwan is one of pioneer
countries to embark on the establishment and development of EPZs. Three EPZs
were established at Kauhsiung, Nantze and Taichung in the 1960s (Dorkenoo,
1999). Based on the standard of the World EPZ Authority (WEPZA), all three
Taiwan’s EPZs are assessed most successful Asian ones. With average area of 8.81
hectares and average investment capital of USD 3.65 millions, a Taiwan’s EPZ
firm can create about 345 direct employment and USD 14.7 millions of export
revenue annually. Most exports of Taiwan are produced in EPZs and with well
developed backward linkages between EPZ firms and the domestic economy, the EPZs
play an important part in the industrialization and economic development of the
country.
2.2. EPZs
IN KOREA
Two first EPZs of Korea were
established in Masan and Iri cities in early 1970s. When operations in Iri’s EPZ
remained relatively modest, those in the Masan grew significantly up to 1988 and
then declined. Capital inflows into the Masan EPZ, for example, increased from
$1.2m in 1970 to $88.9m in 1975. During the late 1970s, there was a drop in the
number of enterprises in the zone but the level of investment kept growing and
the volume of exports tripled. The number of domestically owned firms in the EPZ
increased in 1980s following the Government’s decision to allow local firms to
operate in the enclave. Beside, the EPZs contribute to the economic development
of the region through the both quantitative and qualitative effects on
employment, payment of wages, the procurement of goods and services from local
sources, and the conclusion of subcontracting arrangements. Some 300 local
subcontractors supplied materials to 44 enterprises in that zone, which
benefited from technical support and guidance provided by companies from the
zones (Oh, 1992).
2.3. FREE
TRADE ZONES IN MALAYSIA
In 1968, Malaysia shifted
from ISI to a labour-intensive, export-oriented industrialization with the pass
of Investment Incentive Act (IIA). In an endeavour to generate jobs and exports,
labour-intensive, export-oriented foreign firms were offered pioneer status,
lucrative fiscal incentives, subsidized factory space, and in some cases,
factories already built in industrial estates and free trade zones. As a result
of favourable economic policies, during the take off period of Malaysian FTZs
from early 1970s to 1990, FDI into FTZs, employment and exports increased, which
contributed immensely to the growth and development of the country. While in
period 1980-1990, the average annual growth rate of real GDP is 6.0%, this rate
was 8.6% in next period between 1991 and 1995.
2.4.
SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONES IN CHINA
Since the late 1970s, China
has undergone a transition process, which brought about an impressive upsurge in
production, trade and the standard of living, began essentially with the
establishment of special economic zones (SEZs). Being the most comprehensive
form of EPZ, a SEZ is a geographic area within a country where certain economic
activities are promoted by a set of policy measures that are not generally
applicable to the rest of the country (Ge, 1999). Numerous measures aimed at
reforming the existing economic system and reaching a higher degree of economic
openness were developed and tested in the SEZs. The rise of SEZs generated a
host of impacts on the Chinese economy and on society at large, in which the
most direct and immediate impact of the SEZs on the Chinese economy was the
successful operation of the zones. The robust economic growth, extending over a
considerable period of time, created hundreds of thousands of new, better paying
jobs. This, in turn, enhanced economic welfare and improved the standard of
living for those SEZ workers. The wage increases in the SEZs were closely tied
to the improvement in productivity. The high productivity in the SEZs implied a
more efficient utilization of physical and human resources, the result of the
SEZs’ continuous efforts to develop a market-oriented, open economic structure.
Figure 2.1: Impacts of
SEZs on Chinese economy
|
|
Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer |
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
  Policy
Incentives
Infrastructure Development |
|
Economic and
Legal Reforms |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Trade
and
Overall expansion |
|
SEZs
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
   
|
Domestic Economy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
    Employment
Capacity utilization
Capital Formation
Technology Transfer
Trade Expansion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reform |
|
Openness |
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
 
|
Efficiency
Structural change
Market Development
System Evolution |
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
 
|
Resource Utilization
Growth and Income
Social Changes |
|
Integration into the World Economy
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Ge (1999)
The attractive policy
incentives offered to foreign investors, the improved infrastructure and
facilities, and the market-oriented economic and legal reforms all helped to
sustain a continued foreign capital inflow and a concurrent accelerated
technology transfer. The result of the strengthened forward linkage with the
outside world and the vigorous pursuit of economic and institutional reforms was
the emergence of an economic structure that was more resilient, efficient,
dynamic, and closer in line with the comparative advantages of the SEZs.
Through a backward linkage
between the SEZs and the rest of the domestic economy, not only was the SEZ
expansion sustained, but more fundamentally, other parts of the country were
able to benefit from the SEZ operation in fostering a faster pace of economic
growth.
The development of the SEZs
did not take place at the expense of the rest of the domestic economy. As the
SEZs continued to expand, the zones became not just cost-free but
revenue-generating to the state treasury. The amount of tax revenues that
Shenzhen generated in the period from 1979 to 1995, for example, grew at an
average rate of 50% per annum (Ge, 1999). The cumulative amount that Shenzhen
returned to the state and provincial governments between 1980 and 1995 exceed 50
billion RMB yuan, more than offsetting the funds the zone obtained from these
sources in the period (Ge, 1999).
2.5.
LESSONS FOR VIETNAM
1.
Location
A
favourable location can be viewed as part of a country’s comparative advantage
in economic activities such as trade and investment. Generally, a good location
of an EPZ includes:
a/
Access to market:
Because
of being an industrial development area for export production, an EPZ should be
located near the market of both input and output. Therefore, most EPZs are
located in or near the international transport nodes that include international
airports, sea or river ports as well as railway stations.
b/
Infrastructure
The EPZ
should be located in a commercial or economic center that has relatively good
infrastructure system. Located in an area with good and reliable infrastructure,
the cost for infrastructure investment, especially the connection between EPZ
and the main system will be low. Further, located in the center, the social
infrastructure that includes health center, housing, schools, etc. are also in
good conditions, that can be utilized for foreign investors or workers who will
work in the EPZ.
2.
Legal framework
The EPZs
established as policy instruments, their development heavily depend on the
support of the Government policy. The legal framework should be established to
attract FDI, stimulate export and growth, create job and solve the problem of
unemployment, stimulate the backward linkage between EPZ firms and the domestic
economy, The experience of the Asian EPZs with regards to promotion and support
for investors show strong and open intervention and support from the state,
which was one of the factors underlying the success of these economies.
3.
Capacity of EPZ developers
In most
cases the EPZ’s infrastructure provided by the Government. In some other cases,
especially for countries that lack capital, the Government stimulates foreign
investment into infrastructure of the EPZ. The infrastructure investment is
rather significant and require both money as well as the reputation of the
developer, as it will face many difficulties in clearing the site, compensation
for existing works, investing in infrastructure and advertising to attract the
occupying firms. To invest and develop an EPZ efficiently, the developer should
have necessary financial resources, well organized, and goods reputation in
international market as well as host country market.
Chapter Three:
EXPORT PROCESSING ZONES IN VIETNAM
3.1 OVERVIEW OF EXPORT
PROCESSING ZONES IN
VIETNAM
1. Vietnam’s
industrialization in the renovation process and the relevance of the EPZ
The renovation process of
Vietnam, launched in the Sixth Party Congress in 1986 and accelerated in 1989,
initiated the transition from central planning to a market-oriented economy. A
mixed industrialization strategy between ISI and EOI has been introduced.
Protection remains for some key heavy industries, but most light manufacturing
industries have developed based on the country’s comparative advantages. The
Government plays an active role in directing industrialization, and one of its
activities is to establish EPZs.
From the national point of
view, EPZs are ‘second best’ instruments designed to address temporary economic
and institutional bottlenecks in the process of the country’s transition from a
centrally planned economy to a market one. EPZs were initially established for
the production of export goods to gain access to export markets and technology
by providing free trade status to EPZ investors without liberalizing the entire
economy. The EPZ will provide the international standard infrastructure,
simplified administrative procedures from granting the investment licenses to
management of investment activities. EPZs together with IZs are expected to
provide jobs to alleviate unemployment or under-employment problems, assist in
income creation and create linkages with the local economy. Beside, the EPZs
also designed for purpose of balanced regional development.
2. Characteristics of
Vietnam’s EPZs
a. Legal framework
Vietnam’s EPZs established
and developed under the complete legal system, which are applied synchronously
in the whole country toward foreign investment promotion, especially on
manufacturing industries for export goods.
b. Location: Market access
and infrastructure
All Vietnam’s EPZs are
located in good locations:
Table 3.2: Vietnam’s EPZs
– some main indicators
|
EPZs |
Location |
Year of established |
Total area (ha) |
Rentable area (ha) |
Infrastructure investment capital (USDm.) |
|
Tan Thuan |
HCMC |
1991 |
300 |
210 |
89 |
|
Linh Trung |
HCMC |
1992 |
60* |
43.5* |
14* |
|
Da Nang |
Danang |
1993 |
63 |
53.54 |
13 |
|
Noi Bai |
Ha Noi |
1994 |
100 |
75 |
30 |
|
Can Tho |
Cantho |
1995 |
57.1 |
46.2 |
8.15 |
|
Hai Phong 96 |
Haiphong |
1997 |
150 |
120 |
75 |
Source: Summary from
Economics and Forecast Review (1993)
Vietnam’s EPZs are located in
the favourable condition in term of market access. Located in economic centers
of the region or the country, where the transport is convenient in land, water
and airways, their connections to host country as well as international market
is very comfortable for the investment as well as trade activities of the EPZ
firms. Near the big cities with developed local industrial industries and
agricultural, forestry and aquatic products produced locally can provide enough
raw materials to process in the zone. Further, with the labour-abundant
characteristic of Vietnam, with relatively high literature, can provide enough
workers to work for the EPZ firms.
Most infrastructure of
Vietnam’s EPZs is provided by joint-venture. The joint-venture form of
investment in infrastructure, beside attract foreign capital investment into
infrastructure, makes the foreign investors share the responsibilities and
risks, especially in attracting other foreigners who may not have much
information about Vietnamese market to lease the zone for their production.
Table 3.3: Infrastructure
cost of Vietnam’s and Asian countries’ EPZs
|